Specifically, team leaders should focus on gaining the following practical working knowledge that team members need to get their jobs done.
3. Knowledge of social systems particularly the respective organizations of their stakeholders, their interests, norms, culture and values; 4. Knowledge of the appropriate uses, misuses and effectiveness of power, authority and other instruments of influence and control. Effective leaders understand, practice and help their assistants and other team members engage in an informed and reasoned dialogue. They persistently privilege logic and reason through open and honest communication and principled negotiation. On communications with the public at large, they value transparency, clarity and honesty. They also must keep remain focused and concise to avoid confusion, message dilution or regretting the words they didn't say. They exercise power, only by necessity, in a responsible, self-restrained, professional and accountable conduct. They keep authority, as a deterrent and a tool of last resort. 5. Working knowledge of the psychology of interpersonal compatibility that remarkably enhances business and working relationships. Compatibility is about each person's (team member, client or partner) needs for socialization (inclusion), control and affection.[6] Furthermore, compatibility is also context and culture driven. Without a proficiency in the business customs and working practices of Germany, the North-American managers of Wal-Mart could not lead their short-lived German subsidiary, no matter how hard they tried. 6. Comprehensive knowledge of regulations, standards, labor relations and collective bargaining and agreements affecting their teamwork; 7. Knowledge of ethical dilemmas especially when cherished values conflict; 8. Comprehensive knowledge of the actual task at hand. This substantive knowledge cannot but help the team leader assess the magnitude, complexity, duration and risk of the work to be done. It is frequently what breaks down barriers between the team leader, the assistant and the majority of clients and performers, be they a team of employees or external contractors. Process has its limits and should follow substance, just like form follows structure. Process champions and experts who pay a lip service to substance lack the content to understand and validate the ideas, opinions and recommendations of experts and team members. Even though no one expects university deans to be proficient in the variety of disciplines taught at their faculty, I have witnessed faculty members and other employees lending their support faster to leaders who took the time to gain a greater appreciation of their subject areas; 9. Knowledge of strategic thinking and risk management which necessitates a fundamental understanding of intelligence production, analysis and interpretation; 10. Practical knowledge of current information technology (IT) and virtual communities. Good technology frees us from wasting time on mundane work to (a) focus on important decisions, issue resolution and innovation; and (b) invest more quality time with people. More influential than ever, blogs and other Internet constituencies can widen and either enrich or skew the debate to serve their own agenda. They can be effective in raising funds and recruiting talent and volunteers as demonstrated by Mr. Barack Obama's team during the 2008 primaries and presidential campaign. Leaders must also understand the role of bottom-up grass-roots media culture (You Tube, My space, LinkedIn and Facebook) in shaping public opinion, and not merely the youth's. Furthermore, no leader can remain a passive spectator of the emerging opportunities and disruptions posed by the synergistic convergence of IT with bio- and nanotechnologies. Learning about current and emerging applications is the first step to appreciate the immense potential and risks of this synergy.[7] 11. Knowledge of the rules governing execution, quality and productivity. This includes cutting-edge tools to score, interpret and continually improve performance in a dynamic environment characterized by uncertainty and constant change; 12. Knowledge of the principles and methods of project management, both planning and implementation, in accordance with the level of complexity of the goals to be accomplished; 13. Knowledge about global trends and events that may impact the mission and various stakeholders including clients and team members; and 14. Access to people with reliable information and expertise to make up for the leader's own knowledge deficits and those of the team. Here, recognizing with profound humility that, unlike knowledge, our ignorance is infinite is a virtue. Effective leaders are continually and subtly switching roles from trainers and learners. With respect to all sources of knowledge and education, the consumer beware argument is no less valid in these fields than when you buy a vehicle from a second-hand car dealer. Everyone has something to sell. The claims by enterprising consultants must be validated as carefully if not more than those made by suppliers of other products. The worst thing to do is to apply a new approach without doing your homework i.e. without validating it and adapting it to your needs. 2. Management Skills for Team LeadersLike knowledge, most skills can be learned. In this context, a skill is defined as practiced know-how or applied knowledge... © A. P. Martin, 2009. All rights reserved. [1] Joe Nocerra: Talking Business: The Sinatra of Southwest Feels the Love, The New York Times, May 24, 2008 [2] Adapted phrase borrowed from Senator Chuck Hagel's statement on immigration and featured as Quotation of the Day in The New York Times, April 8, 2006. [3] Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.: America Needs History as Never Before - Folly's Antidote, International Herald Tribune, January 1, 2007 [4] David
Leonhard: How Obama Reconciles Dueling Views on Economy, The New York
Times, August 24, 2008. [5] John Mauldin: Take Me Out to the Stockgame, September 27, 2003 [6] Will Schultz, FIRO: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior, 3rd Edition, 1998, CPP Press [7] Frequently Asked Questions on Nanotechnology, FAQs, 2006-11-15, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany. For the latest on nanotechnology: nanotechnology.com and Nanotechnology at the University of Iowa. Also: University of Texas at Austin: Available Nanotechnologies by Title
|
Customer Video Testimonials
|